Why Foxtons’ results are even worse than its competitors

first_imgProptech consultant James Dearsley (pictured, below) says Foxtons’ results revealed recently in its half-year results has been created by the legacy of its once might CRM system called BOS.The results, which were worse than many of its competitors within the struggling London property market, saw sales drop by a third.James says its IT system, created during the early noughties at a cost of £2 million, initially helped create Foxtons’ success by freeing up its talented but famously ruthless staff to concentrate on the sell, automating almost everything else years before most other competitor agents had developed anything similar.James, who used to work at Foxtons, says the company has “developed itself into a corner” by creating a system that no else uses or can plug into, and that while most other agents now use CRM systems that they can ‘plug and play’ the latest innovative products, Foxtons is left with an inward-looking bespoke system and left to play catch-up.A case in point is the lettings maintenance management software Fixflo which James’s company Proptech consult helped integrate into Connells’ and Countrywide’s systems, but which would struggle to be added to Foxtons’.“[This] leaves them at a competitive disadvantage in a sector where similar outfits, with newer business models and technologies are offering new value to the consumer,” he says.“Foxtons must recapture their spirit of technological innovation, throw BOS in the bin and start again with another 20-year roadmap in mind.”James also says Foxtons’ strategy of investing heavily in low-basic pay negotiators and new branches is misguided when more flexible, hybrid models are starting to threaten the traditional model.Digital transformationNic Budden (pictured, right), who is a company man with 12 years’ at Foxtons, must lead the digital transformation of Foxtons from the front in much the same way Alison Platt has at Countrywide, says James.“With so much [tech] innovation available to landlords and occupiers, Foxtons must establish a new value proposition to ensure they create a meaningful place in this market,” he says.“In an environment where processes are under such pressure from external operators, and consumers are seeking new value propositions, this will not be easy.”Read PropTech Consult’s full report on Foxtons. James Dearsley nic Budden Foxtons August 3, 2017Nigel LewisWhat’s your opinion? Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.Please note: This is a site for professional discussion. Comments will carry your full name and company.This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.Related articles Letting agent fined £11,500 over unlicenced rent-to-rent HMO3rd May 2021 BREAKING: Evictions paperwork must now include ‘breathing space’ scheme details30th April 2021 City dwellers most satisfied with where they live30th April 2021 Home » News » Agencies & People » Why Foxtons’ results are even worse than its competitors previous nextAgencies & PeopleWhy Foxtons’ results are even worse than its competitorsDigital expert and former Foxtons employee James Dearsley says the company’s legacy IT system developed 17 years ago is starting to be a millstone.Nigel Lewis3rd August 201702,039 Viewslast_img read more

Continue reading